Homily for December 23, 2007 4th Sunday of Advent
Did anything strike you as you listened to the genealogy? What? Sevens, and fourteen. By the way, the name David in Hebrew has the numeric value of 14.
If you'd have told Matthew, "Mr. Matthew, your genealogy doesn't meet the standards of the people in Utah," he would have said, "Get a life. That's not what I'm trying to assert."
Anything else strike you? None of the names were repeated. Anything else? Yes, the wife of Uriah. Do you know the story there? David saw Bathsheba, and Bathsheba was married to Uriah, and David invited her over. Well, Bathsheba was with child, Uriah was in the army. So when David discovered it, he brought Uriah home on leave and said, "Go home to your wife." Uriah didn't do it. David kept saying, "Go home to your wife."
And Uriah said, "No, I'm a soldier to my king, and I will stay with the troops."
And so after many attempts to get Uriah to go home to his wife, David sent him back and said, "Put him on the front line, and fall back and let him be killed."
By the way, this genealogy, if you made a movie of it, would probably be R rated or PG13 at best. It's a story of adultery, violence, murder, corruption, deception. There would be themes of sexuality and intense violence and corruption.
Anything else strike you in the genealogy? Some missing names? The women who are mentikoned. Well, let's look at those five women.
First of all it wasn't common to put women in the genealogy. So what do you know about those five women? Tamar was a widow who had had two husbands die on her, and she was the daughter-in-law of Judah. Now keep in mind I said this would be R rated. She was the daughter-in-law of Judah, and Judah promised her another son as a husband, and he didn't deliver o-n his promise.
Tamar posed as a temple prostitute and tricked Judah into becoming the father of her son, and she exacted his ring as a pledge. So when it became known that she was pregnant, and Judah was going to have her put to death, she showed him the ring and said, "The owner of this ring is the father of the child." And Judah said, "You are more righteous than I am." It's kind of a roundabout way of continuing the genealogy, isn't it?
Rahab was an innkeeper who had a red light in the window of her inn, if you know what I mean. And she became the father of Boaz. Ruth by the way, you know that beautiful song they sing at weddings, "Wherever you go, I will go," and it's sung, it's made up as though it's a husband and a wife? It's really what Ruth said to her mother-in-law, Naomi, after both of their had been killed. So it's really about a daughter-in-law and a mother-in-law.
By the way, all of these women were foreigners. They were Gentiles. And they all showed that God continued the line in ways that were outside of social convention, and outside of the line of purity, and outside of the way you would expect it to happen.
In a way, Matthew's community was struggling with the question of diversity and purity of Jewish origins. It had failed in its mission to the Jewish community. It was achieving success in the mission to the Gentiles. Its composition was changing. The liberals were saying, "We don't need those Jewish ways anymore." And the Jewish people were saying, "We've got to hold them at all costs."
And Matthew is trying to hold the middle ground between the liberals and the conservatives. So what did he say? This is who we are. Jesus is not only the Messiah, the son of God, but he's the son of Abraham and the son of David. This is our heritage. We are thoroughly Jewish, but we've always had diversity, and we've always had newcomers, and we've always had foreigners in our blood line.
So how does Jesus qualify as a descendant of David? By all appearances he's the child of an unwed mother, who is adopted by a descendant of David, not a direct descendant. But legally it fits. Maybe the reason Jesus was so sensitive to outsiders and to the marginal people is that he grew up considered a child of an illegitimate union and as somebody marginalized and excluded.
Any other thoughts that come to you? By the way, the kings in there, they were all corrupt. They were adulterers, idolaters. There were some good ones? Who were the good ones, Shirley? Josiah and one of the Hezekiahs, but for the most part they were a pretty corrupt breed. They made the mistake of thinking that it was their kingdom rather than God's kingdom, and so they tried to secure it by human means.
So what's the point of all of that for us? We look at us in the year 2008. It's a mixed history, isn't it? We look at the church and Christianity. It's a history of violence, corruption, deceit. It's a history of many things, and yet God has been there through it. It's God's revelation and God's story, and often God brings the story to completion in ways that defy our expectation, in ways that run counter to our judgment, to our prediction, in ways that don't fit our neat categories of thinking, in ways that often go beyond our moral categories. But through it all, God will fulfill God's promise.
And so here we are. We don't even know when Christmas really was, but if the story were to continue, it would have all of those elements in it, and hopefully we would recognize God's abiding presence and God's hope.
And let's turn and celebrate the Eucharist, maybe with that awareness. This is who we are, and we have always been a mixed breed.
Labels: Homilies
